CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS – COMMERCIAL AGENT – DISTRIBUTION – TOBACCO AND ALCOHOL

Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules that Art. L. 442-6-I-5° does not apply to commercial agency (Établissements Boudier/Baron Philippe de Rothschild France distribution)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Special protection, degraded protection? This is how the consequences of the solution set out by the Commercial Chamber in its ruling of 3 April 2012, which is due to be published in the Bulletin des arrêts de la Cour de cassation, could be summarised. Following the termination of the commercial agent contract, the distributor had summoned its former co-contractor to terminate the relationship in order to have him

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation rules that Art. L. 442-6-I-5° does not apply to commercial agency (Établissements Boudier/Baron Philippe de Rothschild France distribution), 3 April 2012, Concurrences N° 3-2012, Art. N° 48384, p. 132

Visites 262

All reviews