CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS – INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation declares admissible the clause conferring jurisdiction to the German courts contained in the general terms and conditions of the supplier in an interim measure relating to a termination of business relations (SBMM/Ingrid Kränzle)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, 20 March 2012, SBMM v. Ingrid Kränzle, No. 11-11570 The French company SBMM has been supplying industrial cleaning machines to the German company Ingrid Kränzle GmbH since 1994. The relationship was governed by the general terms and conditions of sale of Ingrid Kränzle GmbH. SBMM considers that it has been the victim of a partial breakdown in commercial relations and parasitic behaviour consisting of canvassing for customers, and has applied to the interim relief judge for protective measures aimed at putting an end to its illegal practices on the basis of Article 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The judge declared

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mireille Dany, Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Court of Cassation declares admissible the clause conferring jurisdiction to the German courts contained in the general terms and conditions of the supplier in an interim measure relating to a termination of business relations (SBMM/Ingrid Kränzle), 20 March 2012, Concurrences N° 3-2012, Art. N° 48392, p. 137

Visites 220

All reviews