CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – MOTOR VEHICLE SECTOR – REGULATION (EC) NO 1400/2002 – QUANTITATIVE SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM – CONCEPT OF “SPECIFIED CRITERIA” – AUTOMOBILE – DISTRIBUTION

Quantitative selective distribution system: The Court of Justice interprets the concept of “specified criteria” concerning a quantitative selective distribution system (Auto 24)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CJEU, 14 June 2012, Auto 24, box C-158/11 Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Union by a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) from the Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation), which was asked to rule, in substance, on whether the term 'defined criteria' in Article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 101(3) TFEU to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector (OJ 2002 L 203, p. 1) is not applicable in the present case. 30), must be interpreted as requiring that, in order to benefit from the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Quantitative selective distribution system: The Court of Justice interprets the concept of “specified criteria” concerning a quantitative selective distribution system (Auto 24), 14 June 2012, Concurrences N° 3-2012, Art. N° 48291, pp. 89-90

Visites 276

All reviews