CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIONS – LEGALITY OF THE AUTHORISATION – IDENTIFICATION OF THE COMPANIES BELONGING TO THE SAME GROUP – EVIDENCE OF PRESUMPTIONS JUSTIFYING THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIONS – CONSTRUCTION

Search and seizure operations: The Court of Cassation quashes an ordinance of the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal and adopts an extensive interpretation of the NCA’s powers (Société urbaine de travaux)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. crim. 4 April 2012, Autorité de la concurrence and Société Urbaine de travaux, No. 10-88192. This case concerned the legality of a visit and seizure order which had been partially annulled by an order of 2 November 2010 of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Authors

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
    France 386 contributions 446293 visits
  • Ashurst (Paris)
    France 103 contributions 52774 visits

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Simon Naudin, Search and seizure operations: The Court of Cassation quashes an ordinance of the first president of the Paris Court of Appeal and adopts an extensive interpretation of the NCA’s powers (Société urbaine de travaux), 4 April 2012, Concurrences N° 3-2012, Art. N° 48512, pp. 198-199

Visites 234

All reviews