CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – LIMITATION PERIOD OF TEN YEARS– ORDINANCE OF 13 NOVEMBER 2008 – ENFORCEABILITY – ALL BUSINESS SECTORS

Limitation period of ten years: The Court of Cassation quashes the judgement of the Paris Court of Appeal and rejects the retroactive application of the ten year limitation period introduced by the ordinance of 13 November 2008 to invalidate decisions regularly adopted before its entry into force

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, 15 May 2012, Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry, No. 11-18507 As could have been anticipated, the Court of Cassation, in a decision of 15 May 2012, censured the decision handed down by the Paris Court of Appeal on 5 May 2011 in the Drapo software case (on this decision see Concurrences

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Authors

  • University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne
    France 386 contributions 446292 visits
  • Ashurst (Paris)
    France 103 contributions 52774 visits

Quotation

Christophe Lemaire, Simon Naudin, Limitation period of ten years: The Court of Cassation quashes the judgement of the Paris Court of Appeal and rejects the retroactive application of the ten year limitation period introduced by the ordinance of 13 November 2008 to invalidate decisions regularly adopted before its entry into force, 15 May 2012, Concurrences N° 3-2012, Art. N° 48484, p. 195

Visites 221

All reviews