CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – DAWN RAIDS – IMPLEMENTATION – SEIZURE OF ELECTRONIC FILES – INDIVISIBLE – EXPERT REPORT – MINUTES – INVENTORIES

Seizure of electronic files: The French Supreme Court considers an expert report on the ability to separate the information in emails, without any direct link with the outcome of the proceedings (Rapporteur de l’Adlc / Cour d’Appel de Paris)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. That's kind of the risk of the exercise. Reacting in the moment as soon as the "object The "comments" section is made public, with a period of time for reflection. limited, sometimes leads to misinterpretation. This is what happened produced in my proposed commentary on the Chamber's judgment the Court of Cassation of 16 June 2011, the same court that ruled on the criminal without any concrete connection with the solution of the dispute an expertise measure on the secability of an electronic mailbox. The excessively fast reading I have of this judgment has led me to have the Chamber take over the case the entirety of the plea set out in her appeal by the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Seizure of electronic files: The French Supreme Court considers an expert report on the ability to separate the information in emails, without any direct link with the outcome of the proceedings (Rapporteur de l’Adlc / Cour d’Appel de Paris), 16 June 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 54848, “www.concurrences.com”

Visites 103

All reviews