CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – CONFORMITY WITH THE CONSTITUTION – MINISTER REQUEST

Conformity to the Constitution: The French Constitutional Court rules that article L. 442-6-III of the French commercial code concerning the power of the Minister for Economic Affairs respects the Constitution provided an interpretative reserve (Système U)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. A few months after recognizing under the terms of Decision No. 2010-85 QPC of the January 13, 2011 (Darty and Sons Institution) constitutional compliance the notion of "significant imbalance in the rights and obligations of the parties", a measure introduced by the Law on the Modernisation of the Economy (LME), the Constitutional Council is once again examining the conformity of the the second is a system for the repression of practices restricting competition. of paragraph III of Article L. 442-6 of the French Commercial Code, in its wording prior to Act No. 2008-3 of 3 January 2008 for the development of competition at the service of consumers, allows

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Conformity to the Constitution: The French Constitutional Court rules that article L. 442-6-III of the French commercial code concerning the power of the Minister for Economic Affairs respects the Constitution provided an interpretative reserve (Système U), 13 May 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 54358, “www.concurrences.com”

Visites 83

All reviews