CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – LIMITATION PERIOD OF THEN YEARS – ORDINANCE OF 13 NOVEMBER 2008 – APPLICATION OVER TIME OF THE LAW

Retroactive application of the law: The Paris Court of appeal rules that the ten year limitation period introduced in 2008 is to be retroactively applied, despite a conflicted provision of national law (Razel et Sefi-Intrafor)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 5 May 2011, the Paris Court of Appeal (Pole 5, Chamber 5-7) rendered, under covered by parallelism of forms, a judgment on the implementation of the prescription regime, the solution to which not only causes discomfort, but moreover has a legal basis, to say the least... questionable. This judgment comes in the context of the "Drapo" case, of the name of the software used by companies in the construction industry to distribute the Ile-de-France public procurement. It intervenes by way of reference to the Court otherwise composed after partial cassation, in respect of the Paris Appeals Court, in respect of two companies on 13 October 2009 by the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Retroactive application of the law: The Paris Court of appeal rules that the ten year limitation period introduced in 2008 is to be retroactively applied, despite a conflicted provision of national law (Razel et Sefi-Intrafor), 5 May 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 54291, “www.concurrences.com”

Visites 135

All reviews