CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the supplier reorganizing its network and reducing the number of approved retailers must comply with the obligation to grant a sufficient notice period (Sagil/Audemars Piguet France ; Alain Michal/Audemars Piguet France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. CA Paris, 23.03.11, Sagil v. Audemars Piguet France, 09/17149 CA Paris, 23. 03. 11, Alain Michal v. Audemars Piguet France, 09/17148 Are the provisions of Article 442-6-I-5° of the Commercial Code applicable to the termination of contracts of approved retailers motivated by a restructuring of the network? This is the question answered by the Paris Court of Appeal in two judgements of March 23, 2011 opposing Alain Michal and Sagil respectively to Audemars Piguet

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mary-Claude Mitchell, Sudden termination of commercial relationships: The Paris Court of Appeal decides that the supplier reorganizing its network and reducing the number of approved retailers must comply with the obligation to grant a sufficient notice period (Sagil/Audemars Piguet France ; Alain Michal/Audemars Piguet France), 23 March 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 38008, pp. 134-135

Visites 669

All reviews