CASE COMMENTS : PROCEDURES – STATE AID – ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION – COMPLAINT – ACTION FOR FAILURE TO ACT

State Aid – Abuse of Dominant position: The General Court holds that the Commission is not bound to act upon an insufficiently reasoned complaint (Ryanair)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. GCEU, 19 May 2011, Ryanair v. Commission, Case T-423/07 In a judgment of 19 May 2011, the Court of First Instance clarifies the obligations of the Commission when it receives a complaint concerning the existence of anti-competitive practices, as well as the formal requirements that complaints from third parties must meet in order to be taken into consideration. After having itself been the target of complaints from competitors, Ryanair took over the initiative. In 2005, it denounced to the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, State Aid – Abuse of Dominant position: The General Court holds that the Commission is not bound to act upon an insufficiently reasoned complaint (Ryanair), 19 May 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 38082, pp. 180-181

Visites 733

All reviews