CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES – ARTICLE 101 TFEU – NOTION OF UNDERTAKING – IMPUTABILITY – DECISIVE INFLUENCE EXERCISED BY THE PARENT COMPANY – REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION – INTERNATIONAL REMOVAL SERVICE

Notion of undertaking – Imputability: The General Court accepts to rebut the presumption of decisive influence by a parent company (International Removal Services)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Trib. EU, 16 June 2011, Ziegler v Commission, Case T-199/08, "International removal services". Trib. UE, 16 June 2011, Team Relocations and Amertranseuro International and Others v Commission, cases T-199/08 and T-212/08, "International removal services". Trib. UE, 16 June 2011, Gosselin Group and Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje v Commission, Joined Cases T-208/08 and T-209/08, "International removal services". Trib. UE, 16 June 2011, Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission, Case T-210/08, "International removal services". Trib. EU, 16 June 2011, Putters International v Commission, Case T-211/08, "International Removal Services". In five judgments

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Cyril Sarrazin, Notion of undertaking – Imputability: The General Court accepts to rebut the presumption of decisive influence by a parent company (International Removal Services), 16 June 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 37339, pp. 101-102

Visites 581

All reviews