CASE COMMENTS : RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES – COMMERCIAL COOPERATION – PAYMENT WITHOUT ANY COMPENSATION – CIVIL REMEDIES – MINISTER REQUEST

Commercial cooperation: The Nîmes Court of Appeal sanctions, at the Minister of the Economy request, payments without any compensation, in violation of artIcle L. 442-6-I-1° C. com. (Angledis)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Barely more than a year after a previous decision, currently under appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (Nîmes, 25 February 2010, Concurrences No. 4-2010, p. 146, obs. M. Chagny), the Nîmes Court of Appeal is once again called upon to rule, on the initiative of the Minister of the Economy, on the basis of the former Article L. 442-6-I-2° a) of the Commercial Code, this text having become, after renumbering by the LME Act, but without a change in wording, Article L. 442-6-I-1°. However, the disputed practices - here described, curiously in the light of the designations used in France, as anti-competitive - consist, this time, not in the disproportionate

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

Quotation

Muriel Chagny, Commercial cooperation: The Nîmes Court of Appeal sanctions, at the Minister of the Economy request, payments without any compensation, in violation of artIcle L. 442-6-I-1° C. com. (Angledis), 10 March 2011, Concurrences N° 3-2011, Art. N° 38030, pp. 140-141

Visites 846

All reviews