CASE COMMENTS : UNFAIR COMPETITION - SUDDEN TERMINATION OF COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

Sudden termination of commercial relationships - Annual prescription of Article L. 133-6 C. com.: The Court of Cassation finds that the specific one-year period of limitation for litigation involving carriage of goods contracts does not apply to an action for sudden termination of the commercial relationship with a carrier (Torelli/Saint-Gobain)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. com, May 11, 2010, Maître Torelli v/ société Saint-Gobain emballage, n° 09-10797 The Court of Cassation, hearing a case based on the abrupt termination of commercial relations between the liquidator of a company providing glass collection and transport services and its limited partner, ruled on the question of the application of the one-year statute of limitations of article L. 133-6 C to this type of dispute. Com. covering all actions to which a contract of carriage may give rise. In this case, in 1993 SA Schneid Recyclage signed a

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Mireille Dany, Sudden termination of commercial relationships - Annual prescription of Article L. 133-6 C. com.: The Court of Cassation finds that the specific one-year period of limitation for litigation involving carriage of goods contracts does not apply to an action for sudden termination of the commercial relationship with a carrier (Torelli/Saint-Gobain), 11 May 2010, Concurrences N° 3-2010, Art. N° 32082, pp. 109-110

Visites 1945

All reviews