*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Concordant Aut. dec. no. 10-D-15 of 11 May 2010 relating to practices implemented by the GIE "groupement des Taxis amiénois et de la métropole". After the taxis of Besançon and Belfort (Cons. conc. No. 01-D-78 and 01-D-79 of 21 March 2001), Saint Laurent-du-Var (Cons. conc., dec. No. 01-D-32 of 27 June 2001), Marseille (Cons. conc., dec. No. 06-D-30, 18 Oct. 2006), ConcurrencesNo. 1-2007, comm. K. B.), d'Alpes de Haute-Provence (Cons. conc., Dec. No. 08-D-23, Oct. 15, 2008, ConcurrencesNo. 1-2009, p. 115, obs. L. N.-V.) and Cannes (Cons. conc., Dec. No. 08-D-23, Nov. 5, 2008), the AdlC was interested in Amiens taxis. And once again at the beginning of the
CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVES PRACTICES - PRICE FIXING
Price fixing - Professional association: The French Competition Authority fines again an economic interest grouping of taxis (GTAM)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.