CASE COMMENTS : ANTICOMPETITIVES PRACTICES - MARKET OF THE INDUSTRIAL WIRE - SINGLE AND CONTINUE INFRINGEMENT - IMPACT ON THE MARKET - FINE - LIABILITY OF THE COMMISSION

Liability: The General Court applies its case law, clarifies many issues and upholds the decision of the Commission (Market in industrial thread)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – Trib. UE, 28 April 2010, Amann & Söhne and Cousin Filterie v Commission, Case T-446/05, Industrial Yarn Market – Trib. EU, 28 April 2010, BST v. Commission, Case T-452/05, Industrial Wire Market – Trib. EU, 28 April 2010, Gütermann and Zwicky v. Commission, cases T-456/05 and T-457/05, industrial yarn market The three judgments delivered by the General Court on 28 April 2010 in the Industrial Threads case are full of lessons and clarifications on a large number of issues that recur repeatedly in actions brought against a Commission cartel decision, especially where the leniency procedure has been implemented, i.e. in the vast majority of cases. This is

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Rizom Legal (Paris)

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Liability: The General Court applies its case law, clarifies many issues and upholds the decision of the Commission (Market in industrial thread), 28 April 2010, Concurrences N° 3-2010, Art. N° 31959, pp. 77-78

Visites 1241

All reviews