Insufficient of proof - Fine mitigating: The General Court partially upholds the Commission decision in the copper plumbing tubes sector but rules that the Commission has sufficiently demonstrated the uninterrupted participation in the cartel of some participants and has infringed the principle of equal treatment when calculating the fines imposed to some of them (Copper plumbing tube industry)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – General Court, 19 May 2010, Wieland-Werke a.o. v. Commission, Case T-11/05, Copper plumbing tube industry – General Court, 19 May 2010, IMI a.o. v. Commission, Case T-18/05, Copper plumbing tube industry – General Court, 19 May 2010, Boliden a.o. v. Commission, Case T-19/05, Copper plumbing tube industry – General Court, 19 May 2010, Outokumpu and Luvata , case T-20/05, Copper plumbing tube industry – General Court, 19 May 2010, Chalkor v. Commission, Case T-21/05, Copper plumbing tube industry – General Court, 19 May 2010, KME Germany a.o. v. Commission, Case T-25/05, Copper plumbing tube industry By Decision C(2004)2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to