CASE COMMENTS : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUSES OF JOINT DOMINANCE

Abuse of collective dominant position: The Paris Court of Appeal recalls the criteria of collective dominance and confirms the fine imposed to firms which took part in the cartel agreement (Corsican cement)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CA Paris, ch. 5-7, April 15, 2010, Vicat and Lafarge Ciments on remand after cassation, v. Aut. conc. 07-D-08 of 12 March 2007 concerning practices implemented in the cement supply and distribution sector in Corsica The Corsican cement case, the first act of which was given by decision no. 07-D-08 of the French Competition Council of March 12, 2007, relating to practices implemented in the field of cement supply and distribution in Corsica, has just experienced a new episode with the decision of the Paris Court of Appeal of April 15, 2007, handed down on referral after cassation. The Commercial Chamber had in fact confirmed a first decision of the Court

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Frédéric Marty, Abuse of collective dominant position: The Paris Court of Appeal recalls the criteria of collective dominance and confirms the fine imposed to firms which took part in the cartel agreement (Corsican cement), 15 April 2010, Concurrences N° 3-2010, Art. N° 31993, pp. 91-94

Visites 2408

All reviews