CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - EXCLUSIVITY - DOMINANCE - RELEVANT MARKET - FORECLOSURE - SPORT EVENTS

Exclusivity: The French Competition Authority does not object against the exclusivity granted by the organiser of a major sport event to an equipement manufacturer unless leading to a foreclosure (Boule de pétanque de compétition)

KEYWORDS
Reference

Décision n° 10-D-17 du 25 mai 2010 relative à des pratiques mises en œuvre sur le marché de la boule de pétanque de compétition

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 25 May 2010, the Competition Authority issued a Decision No 10- D-17 on practices implemented in the market for the competitive petanque. Seized more than five years ago by the Minister of the economy, which believed that the international federation of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)
    France 4514 contributions 1114728 visits

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Exclusivity: The French Competition Authority does not object against the exclusivity granted by the organiser of a major sport event to an equipement manufacturer unless leading to a foreclosure (Boule de pétanque de compétition), 25 May 2010, Concurrences N° 3-2010, Art. N° 60863, www.concurrences.com

Visites 144

All reviews