*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a judgment delivered yesterday, 7 April 2010, the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECtHR), sitting in the Commercial Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, has ruled that the cassation came once again to censure the Paris Court of Appeal in the case of the exchange of information between the three operators of mobile telephony - facts of agreement, more sanctioned by the Commission of competition, had not been reached by the first cassation and were therefore no longer in debate. This time the censorship concerns the absence of statement of reasons - lack of legal basis - concerning the
CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION - DAMAGE TO THE ECONOMY - SANCTION - CASSATION
Damage to the economy: The French Supreme Court censurers the Court of Appeal of Paris’ demonstration of the damage to the economy in the case related to the mobile telephony cartel (SFR / Orange)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.