CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - MERGER CONTROL - MOOTNESS - ADMISSIBILITY

Locus standi: The CFI holds that an applicant in liquidation ceases to have an interest in an annulment proceeding against a merger control decision (Socrate - Qualcomm)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 19 June 2009, Socratec v. Commission, Case T-269/03 – IFC, 19 June 2009, Qualcomm v. Commission, Case T-48/04 Both judgments relate to the Commission's 2003 decision approving the merger between DaimlerChrysler and Deutsche Telekom for the creation of a motorway toll collection system. Two rival companies of the merging parties, Socratec and Qualcomm, brought actions for annulment of that decision. First case: No need to adjudicate following the applicant's compulsory liquidation Socratec had been in compulsory liquidation since March 2004 and had not carried out any

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Quotation

Pascal Cardonnel, Locus standi: The CFI holds that an applicant in liquidation ceases to have an interest in an annulment proceeding against a merger control decision (Socrate - Qualcomm), 19 June 2009, Concurrences N° 3-2009, Art. N° 27385, pp. 124-125

Visites 2044

All reviews