CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVES PRACTICES - VERTICAL AGREEMENTS - DISTRIBUTION OF NINTENDO VIDEO GAMES - FINES - DETERRENCE - COMPLIANCE PROGRAMMES AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Fine mitigating: The CFI reduces the amount of fines imposed on two companies ... and shows some indifference to the impact of antitrust compliance programmes (Itochou Corp. ; Nintendo ; CD Contact Data)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 30 April 2009, CD Contact Data v. Commission, Case T-18/03. – CFI, 30 April 2009, Itochou Corp. v Commission, Case T-12/03 – CFI, 30 April 2009, Nintendo v Commission, Case T-13/03 What is the point of having compliance programs in place? This could be one of the conclusions to be drawn from the much-anticipated Nintendo decision. Coming almost seven years after the Commission's decision and more than six years after the appeals (!), the three judgments of the Court of First Instance contain a number of lessons, some of which should encourage companies and their advisers to be doubly careful in their contacts with the services of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Rizom Legal (Paris)

Quotation

Michel Debroux, Fine mitigating: The CFI reduces the amount of fines imposed on two companies ... and shows some indifference to the impact of antitrust compliance programmes (Itochou Corp. ; Nintendo ; CD Contact Data), 30 April 2009, Concurrences N° 3-2009, Art. N° 28170, pp. 80-81

Visites 2128

All reviews