*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CFI, 30 April 2009, CD Contact Data v. Commission, Case T-18/03. – CFI, 30 April 2009, Itochou Corp. v Commission, Case T-12/03 – CFI, 30 April 2009, Nintendo v Commission, Case T-13/03 What is the point of having compliance programs in place? This could be one of the conclusions to be drawn from the much-anticipated Nintendo decision. Coming almost seven years after the Commission's decision and more than six years after the appeals (!), the three judgments of the Court of First Instance contain a number of lessons, some of which should encourage companies and their advisers to be doubly careful in their contacts with the services of the
CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVES PRACTICES - VERTICAL AGREEMENTS - DISTRIBUTION OF NINTENDO VIDEO GAMES - FINES - DETERRENCE - COMPLIANCE PROGRAMMES AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Fine mitigating: The CFI reduces the amount of fines imposed on two companies ... and shows some indifference to the impact of antitrust compliance programmes (Itochou Corp. ; Nintendo ; CD Contact Data)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.