CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURES - RIGHTS OF DEFENCE - VALUE OF EVIDENCE

Evidence - Rights of Defence: The Paris Court of Appeal causes a new bounce in the sounds recording case carried out without the knowledge of the author and used by the French NCA as evidence of an anti-competitive practice (Sony, Philips)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. – CA Paris, 1st ch. H, 29 April 2009, Sony, Philips and others.on remand after cassation, against Cons. conc. 05-D-66 of December 5, 2005, Consumer Electronics Products Sector This decision marks a form of resistance by the Court of Appeal which has already been welcomed by the first commentators (see A. Ronzano, Creda-Concurrence, 30 April 2009, L.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Chantal Momège, Evidence - Rights of Defence: The Paris Court of Appeal causes a new bounce in the sounds recording case carried out without the knowledge of the author and used by the French NCA as evidence of an anti-competitive practice (Sony, Philips), 29 April 2009, Concurrences N° 3-2009, Art. N° 27465, pp. 127-128

Visites 2085

All reviews