*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In a solemn formation presided over by the first president of the Court of Appeal of Paris, which the latter ruled on 29 April 2009, on referral after cassation, on appeals against the decision No. 05-D-66 of the Competition Council, which, it will be recalled, had admitted, as evidence, sound recordings produced by the of conversations with representatives of suppliers or wholesalers with whom she was in contact, accompanied by their transcription, despite the fact that these sound recordings had been made without the knowledge of the author of the remarks made. If the Paris Court of Appeal had, for the first time, validated the process by a decision of
ALERTS : PROCEDURE - PROOF
Evidence: The Paris Court of Appeal declares recordings made without the knowledge of the person admissible (Sony / Philips / Avantage)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.