CASE COMMENT : UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ESSENTIAL FACILITIES - INTERIM MEASURES

Essential facilities: The French Competition Council rejects the request for interim measures as well as the referral of a specialised publisher regarding the qualification as essential facilities of points of sales located in places of interest (Specialised publishing sector)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Conc. conc. dec. no. 08-D-08 of 29 April 2008 on practices implemented in the sector of publishing and sale of tourism monographs Once again after the dispute between the monks of the Abbey of the Islands of Lérins and a carrier (Cons. conc., Dec. No. 05-D-60, 8 November 2005, relating to practices implemented by the Cistercian Congregation of the Immaculate Conception, the Planaria company, the State and the municipality of Cannes V., ConcurrencesNo. 1-2006, pp. 137-139.), the Competition Council is called upon to exercise its talents in a case that mixes tourism, religion and, more prosaically, the finances of the striking company. The commented case

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Essential facilities: The French Competition Council rejects the request for interim measures as well as the referral of a specialised publisher regarding the qualification as essential facilities of points of sales located in places of interest (Specialised publishing sector), 29 April 2008, Concurrences N° 3-2008, Art. N° 20022, pp. 100-102

Visites 3317

All reviews