CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES - PROCEDURE - UNFAIR EVIDENCE - ADMISSIBILITY

Unfair evidence: The Court of Cassation rules that unfair evidences are not admissible in competition law (Sony/Philips)

KEYWORDS

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 3 June 2008, Appeals No. 07-17.147 and No. 07-17.196, Sony France and Philips France Facts In a decision of December 5, 2005, the Competition Council sanctioned suppliers of consumer electronics products for having implemented an anti-competitive agreement with their distributors relating to the application of recommended [1]prices. The Board based its decision on, among other things,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Karine Biancone, Unfair evidence: The Court of Cassation rules that unfair evidences are not admissible in competition law (Sony/Philips), 3 June 2008, Concurrences N° 3-2008, Art. N° 27577, www.concurrences.com

Visites 2076

All reviews