CASE COMMENTS: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - TRANSPARENCY - DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES - PROOF

Discriminatory practices: The Court of Cassation rules that the supplier who competes against its distributor and grants better conditions to final customers is responsible for anticompetitive discrimination (Akzo Nobel)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, 25 April 2006, Appeal No. 03-20.353, Akzo nobel coating c/sté Bonnot Facts A supplier having directly prospected final customers in the territory of one of its distributors, the latter sues it for damages, on the basis of Article L. 442-6, I, 1°, of the French Commercial

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Montpellier

Quotation

Didier Ferrier, Discriminatory practices: The Court of Cassation rules that the supplier who competes against its distributor and grants better conditions to final customers is responsible for anticompetitive discrimination (Akzo Nobel), 25 April 2006, Concurrences N° 3-2006, Art. N° 27365, www.concurrences.com

Visites 2543

All reviews