CASE COMMENT: RESTRICTIVE PRACTICES - NON COMPETE PROVISION

Non-Compete: The Court of Cassation holds that the non-compete provision survives to the company (TGCP)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Cass. soc., 5 April 2005, X c/ Sté TGCP, n° 02-45.540 Must the non-competition indemnity, which is a condition for the validity of any non-competition clause inserted in an employment contract, be paid to the debtor employee when the company has ceased to exist legally? The Court of Cassation answers this question in the affirmative in a decision handed down on 5 April 2005 by the Social Chamber published in the Bulletin and which certainly deserves attention. In this case, the employment contract of an employee in the metallurgical sector included

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University Littoral-Cote d’Opale (Boulogne)

Quotation

Daniel Fasquelle, Non-Compete: The Court of Cassation holds that the non-compete provision survives to the company (TGCP), 5 April 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 1092

Visites 5682

All reviews