CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICE - PUBLIC DEBATE

Public debate: The French Competition Authority considers that defending union’s interests during a public debate through notes drafting is not an anticompetitive practice (Casino du lac de la Magdeleine)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Council Decision No. 05-D-20 of 13 May 2005. The the Casino du Lac de la Magdeleine had won the first prize in the in January 2002 the call for tenders issued by the municipality of Gujan- Mestras (Gironde) to build a casino in the commune. On the other hand, she had been unable to obtain the administrative authorization issued by the Ministry of the Interior necessary for the operation of the games

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Public debate: The French Competition Authority considers that defending union’s interests during a public debate through notes drafting is not an anticompetitive practice (Casino du lac de la Magdeleine), 13 May 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 63101, www.concurrences.com

Visites 72

All reviews