CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICE - DOMINANCE - MARGIN SQUEEZE - PREDATORY PRICES

Margin squeeze - Predatory pricing: The French Competition Authority analyses the behavior of actors on the timber and timber pulp market and concludes that there is no abusive practice (Cogema/Delmas)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Decision No. 05-D-28 of 15 June 2005 concerning practices of companies providing professionals in the timber sector with and wood pulp from handling and storage services at the port of commerce in La Rochelle. In this case, a port service provider, the Fast company, active on the downstream market for truck and trailer hoists, or of rail cars, transit

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Margin squeeze - Predatory pricing: The French Competition Authority analyses the behavior of actors on the timber and timber pulp market and concludes that there is no abusive practice (Cogema/Delmas), 15 June 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 63343, www.concurrences.com

Visites 68

All reviews