CASE COMMENT : DISTRIBUTION - ARTICLE L. 330-3 OF THE COMMERCIAL CODE - NEED TO PROVE LACK OF CONSENT

Franchising: The French Supreme Court rules on the validity of the franchise contract faced to lack of previous information (Prodim / Decroix)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts Franchisees having terminated their contracts with their franchisor, the latter assigned them in payment of arrears and severance pay. The franchisees counterclaimed for cancellation of the contract. The judges on the merits granted their request, but the judgment was overturned by the Commercial

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Thierry Titone, Franchising: The French Supreme Court rules on the validity of the franchise contract faced to lack of previous information (Prodim / Decroix), 14 June 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 27720, www.concurrences.com

Visites 1974

All reviews