CASE COMMENT: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - ABUSE OF DOMINANCE - EVIDENCE

Evidence: The Paris Court of Appeal sanctions the French Competition Authority’s insufficiencies and contradictions when applying the rule of evidence to abuse of dominance (France Telecom/SFR)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. It is therefore on the basis of evidence alone that Decision No 04-D-48 adopted by the Council of the European Union on 14 October 2004 competition was reformed by the Paris Court of Appeals in a decision of the Paris Court of April 12, 2005. It will be remembered that, seized by an association grouping together of telecom operators complaining about the conditions the three integrated operators (offering to the of both fixed and mobile telephony) on calls the Council had imposed sanctions on

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Evidence: The Paris Court of Appeal sanctions the French Competition Authority’s insufficiencies and contradictions when applying the rule of evidence to abuse of dominance (France Telecom/SFR), 12 April 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 62755, www.concurrences.com

Visites 75

All reviews