CASE COMMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICE - CONSORTIUM - EVIDENCE

Consortium - Evidence: The French Competition Authority rules again on the tenders’ submission practice by consortium of undertakings and specifies the applicable level of proof (Aménagement routier dans la Somme)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. In 1995 and 1996, two public contractors from the department of Somme had launched fifteen calls for tender for the following projects road development work throughout the entire department. While many companies - 44 - responded by formulating 217 different bids, 13 of these 15 contracts were awarded to companies having previously regrouped. The Minister, finding the abnormally high number of bundled bids and surprisingly 15 groups have, in different

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Consortium - Evidence: The French Competition Authority rules again on the tenders’ submission practice by consortium of undertakings and specifies the applicable level of proof (Aménagement routier dans la Somme), 31 May 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 63223, www.concurrences.com

Visites 105

All reviews