CASE COMMENT: PROCEDURE - CALCULATION OF FINES - EUROPEAN LAW PRINCIPLES - ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICE

Calculation of fines: Advocate-General Tizzano proposes to let the Commission some flexibility to calculate the fines it inflicts (Archer Daniels Midland)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Advocate General Tizzano this morning presented his Opinion in Case C-397/03 P (Archer Daniels v Commission) Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients v. Commission). Sanctioned on 7 June 2000 by the Commission for taking part in the lysine cartel, Archer Daniels Midland Company and its European Subsidiary Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients brought an action against against the Commission's decision contesting the calculation of the amount of the fines imposed on them. The The Court of First Instance, in a judgment in the 9 July 2003 (Case T-224/00), essentially confirmed, Commission Decision 2001/418/EC. The companies then brought an appeal

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Calculation of fines: Advocate-General Tizzano proposes to let the Commission some flexibility to calculate the fines it inflicts (Archer Daniels Midland), 7 June 2005, Concurrences N° 3-2005, Art. N° 63211, www.concurrences.com

Visites 67

All reviews