Franchising: The Paris Court of Appeal revisits the franchisor’s pre-contractual obligation to provide information and, in particular, the provision by the franchisor of a projected operating account (All Frames / Multivision Franchise)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On April 11, 2011, All Frames, after having read the pre-contractual information document provided by its franchisor, Multivision Franchise, entered into a franchise agreement with the latter for the operation of an optical store located in Tours. The franchised company was placed in receivership on December 1, 2015, and All Frames, through the intermediary of the appointed receiver, sued the franchisor on two grounds (fraud and lack of cause) to have the franchise agreement declared null and void and to obtain compensation for the damages suffered. On March 6, 2019, the Paris Commercial Court dismissed the case and appealed to the Paris Court of Appeal.

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Philippe Vanni, Franchising: The Paris Court of Appeal revisits the franchisor’s pre-contractual obligation to provide information and, in particular, the provision by the franchisor of a projected operating account (All Frames / Multivision Franchise), 12 January 2022, Concurrences N° 2-2022, Art. N° 106230, pp. 123-125

Visites 76

All reviews