Avantage: The Court of Justice of the European Union recalls that a State measure intended to compensate for a restriction on the use of a property imposed by the State remains an advantage liable to constitute State aid (Satini-S)

KEYWORDS
Reference

CJEU, Jan. 27th, 2022, Satini-S SIA , C-238/20, EU:C:2022:57

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Satini preliminary ruling does not only concern the field of state aid, and in this field it does not contain any major innovation. However, the judgment has the great merit of recalling with great clarity that compensation for a disadvantage remains in general an advantage within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. In

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

This document is protected by copyright laws and international copyright treaties. Non-authorised use of this document constitutes a violation of the publisher's rights and may be punished by up to 3 years imprisonment and up to a € 300 000 fine (Art. L 335-2 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle). Personal use of this document is authorised within the limits of Art. L 122-5 CPI and DRM protection.

PDF Version

Author

  • European Commission - Legal Service (Brussels)
    Belgium 174 contributions 77147 visits

Quotation

Bruno Stromsky, Avantage: The Court of Justice of the European Union recalls that a State measure intended to compensate for a restriction on the use of a property imposed by the State remains an advantage liable to constitute State aid (Satini-S), 27 January 2022, Concurrences N° 2-2022, Art. N° 106606, p. 164

Visites 41

All reviews