Direct affectation: The Advocate General Rantos calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union declaring the appellant’s action inadmissible and to regard it as directly affected (Danske Slagtermestre)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On February 24, 2022, Advocate General Athanasios Rantos delivered his conclusions in Case C-99/21 (Danske Slagtermestre v. European Commission) on the admissibility of an action brought by competitors of the beneficiaries of aid measures in the context of the third hypothesis referred to in Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU. The case was initiated by Danske Slagtermestre, a trade association representing small Danish butchers, slaughterhouses, wholesalers and processors, who complained to the Commission that the Kingdom of Denmark had granted state aid to large slaughterhouses in the form of reduced contributions for waste water collection. The

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Direct affectation: The Advocate General Rantos calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union declaring the appellant’s action inadmissible and to regard it as directly affected (Danske Slagtermestre), 24 February 2022, Concurrences N° 2-2022, Art. N° 105356, www.concurrences.com

Visites 213

All reviews