*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On February 24, 2022, Advocate General Athanasios Rantos delivered his conclusions in Case C-99/21 (Danske Slagtermestre v. European Commission) on the admissibility of an action brought by competitors of the beneficiaries of aid measures in the context of the third hypothesis referred to in Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU. The case was initiated by Danske Slagtermestre, a trade association representing small Danish butchers, slaughterhouses, wholesalers and processors, who complained to the Commission that the Kingdom of Denmark had granted state aid to large slaughterhouses in the form of reduced contributions for waste water collection. The
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.