*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Yet another episode in the saga of the incidental visits and seizures carried
Dawn raids: The First President of the Paris Court of Appeal considers that the presumptions of anti-competitive practices remaining in the file after the invalidation of the visit and seizure operations carried out at the premises of a television manufacturer justify those carried out at the plaintiff’s premises (Whirpool)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.