CASE COMMENTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES - SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE - APPLICATION OF THE LAW IN TIME - TACIT RENEWAL

Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that the former article L. 442-6, I, 2° of the C. com. is applicable to contracts tacitly renewed after the entry into force of the Law on the modernisation of the economy (B. / Marc B.)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The recasting of Title IV and the creation of a new article L. 442-1 succeeding the former article L. 442-6 did not extinguish, in one fell swoop, the difficulties of application of the old

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Aix-Marseille

Quotation

Frédéric Buy, Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal rules that the former article L. 442-6, I, 2° of the C. com. is applicable to contracts tacitly renewed after the entry into force of the Law on the modernisation of the economy (B. / Marc B.), 17 February 2021, Concurrences N° 2-2021, Art. N° 100539, p. 111

Visites 31

All reviews