ALERTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – SUDDEN BREAK OF ESTABLISHED BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court confirms the criteria for continuing a relationship initiated by a third party and the sectorization of a relationship based on separate activities (R. distribution / Franciaflex, AJRS)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Facts A carrier was initially linked to a first company for one year when the latter went into receivership and was subsequently sold all its assets. The transferee having allowed itself a partial substitution option in favour of its subsidiary, the latter approached the carrier and concluded, a month and a half later, a tariff agreement retroactive to the beginning of the month. Less than two years later, the new partners disagreed on the evolution of rates and the subsidiary gave one month's notice to terminate the " distribution " business and, at the end of this first period, gave one week's notice to terminate the " touring " business and one month's

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Clémence Mouly-Guillemaud, Sudden termination: The French Supreme Court confirms the criteria for continuing a relationship initiated by a third party and the sectorization of a relationship based on separate activities (R. distribution / Franciaflex, AJRS), 10 February 2021, Concurrences N° 2-2021, Art. N° 100705, www.concurrences.com

Visites 16

All reviews