ALERTS: PROCEDURES - FRANCE - FOOD - LENIENCY - CARTEL - SANCTIONS - PRIORITY QUESTION ON CONSTITUTIONALITY

Priority question on constitutionality: The Paris Court of Appeal refuses to transmit to the Court of Cassation a priority question on constitutionality filed in the context of the horizontal cartel case in the pork sector (S.C.O.)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Here's a notebook that's still making a lot of noise about him This notebook is the one that the Campofrio Group incidentally entrusted to the investigation services of the Competition Authority when it filed its first-rank leniency application in the pork butchering case that gave rise to the decision no. 20-D-09 of 16 July 2020The Authority severely sanctioned three horizontal agreements totalling EUR 93 million. However, the convictions were largely based on the information contained in the notebook drawn up by a Campofrio employee who, presenting himself as a scrupulous witness to the slightest developments in the cartel, took notes on post-it notes

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Priority question on constitutionality: The Paris Court of Appeal refuses to transmit to the Court of Cassation a priority question on constitutionality filed in the context of the horizontal cartel case in the pork sector (S.C.O.), 4 March 2021, Concurrences N° 2-2021, Art. N° 99533, www.concurrences.com

Visites 73

All reviews