ALERTS: STATE AID - DENMARK - GERMANY - RAIL TRANSPORT - ROAD TRANSPORT - EXISTING AID

Existing aid: Advocate General Pitruzzella calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to confirm that measures for the financing of road and rail connections with the Danish hinterland granted in the framework of the Fehmarn Strait fixed rail-road link project between Germany and Denmark did not constitute State aid (Scandlines, Stena Line Scandinavia)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 11 March 2021, Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella delivered his conclusions in Joined Cases C-174/19 (Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission) and C-175/19 (Stena Line Scandinavia AB v European Commission). It will be recalled that, with two judgments delivered in almost identical terms on 13 December 2018 in cases T-630/15 (Scandlines Danmark ApS and Others v Commission) and T-631/15 (Stena Line Scandinavia AB v Commission)concerning the public financing of the Fehmarn Strait fixed rail-road link between Germany and Denmark, the General Court of the European Union annulled the Commission's decision of 23 July

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Existing aid: Advocate General Pitruzzella calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to confirm that measures for the financing of road and rail connections with the Danish hinterland granted in the framework of the Fehmarn Strait fixed rail-road link project between Germany and Denmark did not constitute State aid (Scandlines, Stena Line Scandinavia), 11 March 2021, Concurrences N° 2-2021, Art. N° 99666, www.concurrences.com

Visites 78

All reviews