ALERTS: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES – ABUSE OF ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE – ABUSE OF DOMINANCE – SIGNIFICANT IMBALANCE – LIMITATION PERIOD

Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal gives useful details on the lack of subjection to a significant imbalance (Plaisir Selection Japan / Organisation Intra groupe des achats)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. 1era case - Absence of tender in case of a call for tenders Facts. A company is entrusted by Orange with the connection and maintenance of its telecommunications network. Following a new call for tenders launched by the latter, the former was only selected for one sector and not for the other, the parties having signed a memorandum of understanding on this point. Trouble. The question before the Court here is whether, as the service provider submits, Orange subjected it to a significant imbalance in terms of the transfer of charges without compensation by delegating to it administrative tasks which it had hitherto performed, exploited its

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Centre de Droit de l’Entreprise (Montpellier)

Quotation

Sibylle Chaudouet, Significant imbalance: The Paris Court of Appeal gives useful details on the lack of subjection to a significant imbalance (Plaisir Selection Japan / Organisation Intra groupe des achats), 27 February 2020, Concurrences N° 2-2020, Art. N° 94785, www.concurrences.com

Visites 77

All reviews