ALERTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES - EUROPEAN UNION - PAY FOR DELAY - ANTICOMPETITIVE OBJECT / EFFECT - ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION

Pay for delay: The Court of Justice of the European Union sets out the conditions under which an pay for delay agreement constitutes a restriction of competition by object or effect and how it can be analyzed as an abuse of a dominant position (Generics - UK)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article in French, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Just eight days after General Counsel Juliane Kokott presented her findings... in Case C-307/18 (Generics (UK) and Others), the Court of Justice of the European Union has therefore delivered its judgment in record time on 30 January 2020 in the same case.. Under the terms of this judgment - entirely in line with the conclusions of its Advocate General - the Court intends to act as an educational tool by explaining in detail the conditions under which - that is to say, in practice, the elements of the context in which it is set - a pay-for-delay agreement constitutes a restriction of competition by object or effect and its conclusion can be

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Pay for delay: The Court of Justice of the European Union sets out the conditions under which an pay for delay agreement constitutes a restriction of competition by object or effect and how it can be analyzed as an abuse of a dominant position (Generics - UK), 30 January 2020, Concurrences N° 2-2020, Art. N° 93118, www.concurrences.com

Visites 511

All reviews