CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – FRANCE – FRANCHISE – STATE OF ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE – MINIMUM SUPPLY AND NON-COMPETITION CLAUSES

Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal does not accept the franchisee’s state of dependence in the presence of minimum supply and non-competition clauses (Mac’alimenta / Distribution Casino France)

Le 23 janvier 2019, la Cour d’appel de Paris a eu à connaître d’un différend - désormais classique – qui opposait un franchiseur de la grande distribution alimentaire à l’un de ses franchisés invoquant un état de dépendance économique à son

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Dominique Ferré, Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal does not accept the franchisee’s state of dependence in the presence of minimum supply and non-competition clauses (Mac’alimenta / Distribution Casino France), 23 January 2019, Concurrences Review N° 2-2019, Art. N° 90257, p. 95

Visites 102

All reviews