CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – FRANCE – FRANCHISE – STATE OF ECONOMIC DEPENDENCE – MINIMUM SUPPLY AND NON-COMPETITION CLAUSES

Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal does not accept the franchisee’s state of dependence in the presence of minimum supply and non-competition clauses (Mac’alimenta / Distribution Casino France)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. On 23 January 2019, the Paris Court of Appeal heard a now classic dispute between a food

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Dominique Ferré, Franchise: The Paris Court of Appeal does not accept the franchisee’s state of dependence in the presence of minimum supply and non-competition clauses (Mac’alimenta / Distribution Casino France), 23 January 2019, Concurrences N° 2-2019, Art. N° 90257, p. 95

Visites 271

All reviews