CASE COMMENTS: REGULATIONS – ENERGY – SANCTION – VERTICALLY INTEGRATED OPERATOR

Energy: The French Supreme Administrative Court rules on the conventionality procedure applicable before the Dispute Settlement and Sanctions Committee of the French Energy Regulatory Commission in case of refusal to implement a sanction (UFC-Que Choisir)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. Seized by a consumers' association with a decision to refuse the member appointed by the CRE's CoRDiS to follow up on a complaint lodged against ENEDIS, the electricity transmission system operator, the Conseil d'État has, on the one hand considered that the plea alleging breach of the principle of impartiality laid down in Article 6§1 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was ineffective against such a decision and, secondly, that the criticisms made of the existing links between ENEDIS and EDF (the parent company) were all unfounded. The Context Article L. 134-25 of the Energy Code, as amended by Article 2

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Emmanuel Guillaume, Michaël Perche, Energy: The French Supreme Administrative Court rules on the conventionality procedure applicable before the Dispute Settlement and Sanctions Committee of the French Energy Regulatory Commission in case of refusal to implement a sanction (UFC-Que Choisir), 18 March 2019, Concurrences N° 2-2019, Art. N° 90492, pp. 167-168

Visites 251

All reviews