CASE COMMENTS: DISTRIBUTION – FRANCE – SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION – RESALE OUTSIDE THE NETWORK

Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal brought against a non-authorised reseller who has been legally supplied (LIDL / Puma France)

Un fabricant du secteur des articles de sport et de loisir assigne une enseigne de la grande distribution afin de lui reprocher la violation de son réseau de distribution sélective et des actes de concurrence déloyale. En réponse, le défendeur produit 73 factures faisant état d’un approvisionnement auprès d’un

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • University of Strasbourg

Quotation

Nicolas Ereseo, Selective distribution: The Paris Court of Appeal dismisses the appeal brought against a non-authorised reseller who has been legally supplied (LIDL / Puma France), 9 January 2019, Concurrences Review N° 2-2019, Art. N° 90243, pp. 91-92

Visites 82

All reviews