ALERTS: CARTELS - MARKET SHARING - COORDINATION OF PRICES - PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT - DAMAGES - PRESCRIPTION

Prescription: The Paris Court of Appeal disregards the prescription period and recognizes the existence of an injury arising from the anti-competitive practice of the cartel of phosphates for animal food (Doux Aliments / Timab Industries / CFPR)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The Paris Court of Appeal, hearing a claim for compensation for competitive harm following the conviction of the phosphate cartel for animal feed, set aside the statute of limitations and found that there was damage causally linked to the civil fault resulting from the anti-competitive practice, but ordered an expert's report to enable it to quantify the damage. On February 6, 2019, Chamber 5-4 of the Paris Court of Appeal issued a judgment in a case Doux Aliments v. Timab Industries and its parent company, Compagnie Financière et de Participation Roullier (CFPR)..

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • L’actu-concurrence (Paris)

Quotation

Alain Ronzano, Prescription: The Paris Court of Appeal disregards the prescription period and recognizes the existence of an injury arising from the anti-competitive practice of the cartel of phosphates for animal food (Doux Aliments / Timab Industries / CFPR), 6 February 2019, Concurrences N° 2-2019, Art. N° 89554, www.concurrences.com

Visites 419

All reviews