*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. *List of decisions rendered during the comment period. Decisions commented on in this column are marked with an asterisk; others are simply cited without being commented on in detail. CJUE, 23 Nov. 2017, Gasorba SL, Ms R. G., Mr F. G. v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA, Case C-547/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:891; Europe, 2018/1, comm. 18, note L. Idot; RDC, 2018, p. 92, note L. Idot; Contracts conc. consom. , 2018/1, comm. 16, note D. Bosco; ibid. ibid., 2018/2, comm. 34, note G. Decocq* Cass. com., Sept. 13, 2017, n° 15-22837 and 15-23070; Letter Actu-Concurrence, Oct. 16, 2017, note M. Chagny ;Concurrences no. 1-2018, Art. no. 85814, p. 81, note E.
Share on
|
|
LEGAL PRACTICE: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES - PROCEDURES - COMPENSATION - PASSING ON DEFENCE
Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (Sep. 2017 – Feb. 2018)
The decisions commented in this article confirm the main features of the private enforcement of antitrust law in France. It is still a varied litigation between businesses. In follow-on litigations, claimants experience some recurring problems regarding prescription and passing on defence. In the case of stand-alone litigation, the main legal issues before the courts seem, in fact, simpler. It appears easier thus for claimants to prevail.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
