*Liste des décisions rendues lors de la période sous commentaire. Les décisions commentées dans la présente chronique sont marquées d’un astérisque ; les autres sont simplement citées sans être commentées en détail. CJUE, 23 nov. 2017, Gasorba SL, Mme R. G., M. F. G. c/ Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos SA, aff. C-547/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:891 ; Europe, 2018/1, comm. 18, note L. Idot ; RDC, 2018, p. 92, note L. Idot ; Contrats conc. consom., 2018/1, comm. 16, note D. Bosco ; ibid., 2018/2, comm. 34, note G. Decocq* Cass. com., 13 sept. 2017, n° 15-22837 et 15-23070 ; Lettre Actu-Concurrence, 16 oct. 2017, note M. Chagny ;Concurrences no 1-2018, Art. no 85814, p. 81, note E. Thomas* Cass. com., 18 oct. 2017 no 15-26.363, ECLI : ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CO01275, inédit* Cass. com., 20 déc. 2017, no
Share on
|
|
LEGAL PRACTICE: ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES - PROCEDURES - COMPENSATION - PASSING ON DEFENCE
Private enforcement of antitrust law in France (Sep. 2017 – Feb. 2018)
The decisions commented in this article confirm the main features of the private enforcement of antitrust law in France. It is still a varied litigation between businesses. In follow-on litigations, claimants experience some recurring problems regarding prescription and passing on defence. In the case of stand-alone litigation, the main legal issues before the courts seem, in fact, simpler. It appears easier thus for claimants to prevail.
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.
