CASE COMMENTS: EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW – CASELAW – UNITED STATES – PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT – MONOPOLY – SHARING ECONOMY

United States: The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals rejects an appeal brought by Philadelphia taxi drivers in monopoly case against transportation network company (Philadelphia Taxi Association / Uber)

*This article is an automatic translation of the original article, provided here for your convenience. Read the original article. The advent of the "new economy" is a source of tension. Companies in the "old world" are faced with a new form of competition and this confrontation is at the root of many disputes brought under competition law (on this topic and on the idea that this confrontation is at the root of a new populism in antitrust, see B. Orbach, Antitrust Populism, 14 N.Y.U. J.L. & Bus., 2017.1). A decision of 27 March 2018, handed down by the Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit, provides a new illustration of the war between the Uber company and American taxis in major cities in the United States. Taxi drivers in Philadelphia felt aggrieved by the arrival in their city

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jean-Christophe Roda, United States: The 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals rejects an appeal brought by Philadelphia taxi drivers in monopoly case against transportation network company (Philadelphia Taxi Association / Uber), 27 March 2018, Concurrences N° 2-2018, Art. N° 87021, pp. 205-207

Visites 198

All reviews