CASE COMMENTS: UNILATERAL PRACTICES – FRANCE – ECONOMIC NONSENSE – NEW NEWSPAPER LAUNCHING – SPORT PRESS

Exclusionary strategy: The French Supreme Court rejects a claim against a Paris Court of Appeal ruling confirming a decision of the French Competition Authority fining a newspaper’s owner for exclusionary practice during the launch of a new newspaper which had no economic sense but to hinder entry of new competitor on the daily press market for sport (Amaury)

Par un arrêt du 1er mars 2017, la Cour de cassation a rejeté le pourvoi du groupe Amaury contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Anne Wachsmann, Nicolas Zacharie, Exclusionary strategy: The French Supreme Court rejects a claim against a Paris Court of Appeal ruling confirming a decision of the French Competition Authority fining a newspaper’s owner for exclusionary practice during the launch of a new newspaper which had no economic sense but to hinder entry of new competitor on the daily press market for sport (Amaury), 1 March 2017, Concurrences Review N° 2-2017, Art. N° 83881, p. 102

Visites 136

All reviews